Williamson v. Nichols

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “asserting defensive claims [in court]—even if such claims seek affirmative relief—does not waive [the right to compel] arbitration”
• holding that on motion of a party to an arbitration agreement the trial court must order arbitration even though the order might result in less efficient, separate proceedings
• holding that on motion of a party to an arbitration agreement the trial court must order arbitration even though the order might result in less efficient, separate proceedings
• holding RSL’s conduct in litigation regarding one party was not relevant to question of whether RSL waived its arbitration rights with other parties
• holding RSL’s conduct in litigation regarding one party was not relevant to question of whether RSL waived its arbitration rights with other parties
• affirming because appellant failed to challenge ground on which trial court could have ruled in denying motion

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).