Skip to main content
· 10/9/1903

Williamson v. Lake County

Citations

  • 17 S.D. 353
  • 96 N.W. 702
  • 1903 S.D. LEXIS 56

Syllabus

<p>1. The fact that copies of papers served by a sheriff were printed by the plaintiff, for whom they were served, is no reason why fees for such copies should not he taxed as costs against defendant.</p> <p>2. The title of a deputy sheriff to his office cannot be attacked collaterally on a motion, to which he is not a party, to compel the clerk to tax as costs in a cause certain fees of the deputy for service of process.</p> <p>3. A deputy sheriff, acting under an appointment made by the sheriff, is. a de facto officer, though he has not filed his appointment and oath of office, as required by Pol. Code, § 1818, and service of process made by him is valid as to defendant.</p> <p>5. A plaintiff who has paid to a sheriff fees for the service of process is entitled to have such fees taxed as costs, though the deputy serving the process was merely a de facto officer.</p> <p>Haney, P. J., dissenting.</p>

Judges: Corson, Haney

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.