Skip to main content
· 11/9/2000

Williamson v. Harvey Smith, Inc.

Citations

  • 542 S.E.2d 151
  • 246 Ga. App. 745
  • 2001 Fulton County D. Rep. 13
  • 2000 Ga. App. LEXIS 1339

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • bad faith may be found in the defendants’ carrying out the provisions of the contract
  • ex- plaining that the party seeking fees has “the burden of proof and must segregate out the hours that are recoverable from those hours not recoverable”
  • “The fact that [the witness] was a party to the case simply goes to the weight and credibility of his expert testimony, not to his qualifications as an expert.”
  • “The fact that [the witness] was a party to the case simply goes to the weight and credibility of his expert testimony, not to his qualifications as an expert.”
  • “The question of whether a witness is qualified to render an opinion as an expert is a legal determination for the trial court and will not be disturbed absent a manifest abuse of discretion.” (citation and punctuation omitted)
  • \The question of whether a witness is qualified to render an opinion as an expert is a legal determination for the trial court and will not be disturbed absent a manifest abuse of discretion.\ (citation and punctuation omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Pope, Miller, Mikell

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.