Williamson v. Cowan

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding, “[b]ecause Appellant never challenged the adequacy of the findings in a motion for rehearing ... the issue was not properly preserved for appellate review.”
• holding, “[bjecause Appellant never challenged the adequacy of the findings in a motion for rehearing ... the issue was not prqperly preserved for appellate review.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).