Skip to main content
· 7/15/1858

Williamson v. Amilton

Citations

  • 13 La. Ann. 387

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • purpose of objection is to allow parties and judge to address admissibility of evidence
  • prior consistent statements in a videotaped interview with a social worker were admissi- ble to rebut the appellant’s charge that trial counsel subse- quently shaped the testimony that a witness gave at trial
  • cit- ing United States v. Faison, 49 M.J. 59 (C.A.A.F. 1998); United States v. Taylor, 44 M.J. 475, 480 (C.A.A.F. 1996); United States v. Morgan, 31 M.J. 43, 46 (C.M.A. 1990); Unit- ed States v. McCaskey, 30 M.J. 188, 192 (C.M.A. 1990)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Spofford

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.