Williamsburg Canning Co. v. DeLaney

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “Intervening complaints—even when they would have been removable if filed first—do not support removal”
• “The Supreme Court has determined that Congress intended to preclude plaintiff-directed removal, based solely on counterclaims brought against the plaintiff …”
• “intervening complaints do not support removal”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).