Williams v. Williams

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that marriage was void under § 125.290 because purported wife was still married to another at the time of marriage
• recognizing that \[r]ulings supported by substantial evidence will not be disturbed on appeal\
• recognizing that \Hulings supported by substantial evidence will not be disturbed on appeal\
• recognizing that \Hulings supported by substantial evidence will not be disturbed on appeal\
• stating that where testimony was conflicting, district court was free to reject testimony of one party
• providing that if a district court's factual determinations are supported by substantial evidence on appeal, this court will not disturb them

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

12 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Parental Responsibilities Concerning D.P.G
  Colorado Court of Appeals· 2020-07-23· cited 819×
• Ellis v. Carucci
  Nevada Supreme Court· 2007-06-28· cited 116×
• Seaton v. Seaton
  California Court of Appeal· 2011-11-08· cited 16×
• Irving v. Irving
  Nevada Supreme Court· 2006-05-25· cited 13×
• DeVries v. Gallio
  Nevada Supreme Court· 2012-12-13· cited 11×
• Trustees of the IL WU-PMA Pension Plan v. Peters
  N.D. California· 2009-09-21· cited 5×
• In re Estate of McDonald
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 2024-04-15· cited 5×
• McClintock v. McClintock
  Nevada Supreme Court· 2006-07-20· cited 3×
• DAVIS VS. EWALEFO (CHILD CUSTODY)
  Nevada Supreme Court· 2015-07-02
• WALKER VS. DIST. CT. (MICHAELS)
  Nevada Supreme Court· 2020-12-10
• Davitian-Kostanian v. Kostanian
  Nevada Supreme Court· 2023-08-31
• OSHIRO v. OSHIRO (FAMILY)
  Nevada Supreme Court· 2025-11-26