Skip to main content

Williams v. Williams

Citations

  • 645 A.2d 1118
  • 1994 Me. LEXIS 168

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that “inadvertently switch[ing]” figures in a divorce judgment constituted a clerical error
  • holding that appellant’s failure to file a Rule 60(a) motion to correct a clerical mistake or an error due to oversight with the trial court does not prevent the appellant from raising the issue of the mistake or error on appeal
  • reasoning that property is acquired as it is paid for
  • accepting an average of previous years’ income
  • accepting an average of previous years’ income

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Wathen, Roberts, Glassman, Clifford, Rudman, Dana, Collins

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

19 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

15 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.