District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1/29/1997
Williams v. Williams
Citations
- 686 So. 2d 805
- 1997 WL 30813
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- recognizing that the short duration of a marriage can sometimes justify an unequal distribution of marital assets and liabilities
- holding that husband's significant contribution of premarital assets, which were commingled and untraceable, did not justify the trial court's disparate treatment of the marital assets in a nine-year marriage
- finding the husband’s efforts as a primary wage earner did not, in themselves, justify unequal distribution
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Pariente
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
14 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Belmont v. BelmontDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2000-05-12· cited 32×
- Farrior v. FarriorSupreme Court of Florida· 1999-06-24· cited 20×
- Vaughn v. VaughnDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1998-07-27· cited 13×
- Hay v. HayDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2006-08-16· cited 8×
- Franklin v. FranklinDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2008-07-30· cited 7×
- Horne v. HorneDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1998-06-03· cited 4×
- Spielberger v. SpielbergerDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1998-07-08· cited 4×
- Knecht v. PalmerDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2018-08-03· cited 4×
- Hitchcock v. HitchcockDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2008-10-22· cited 3×
- Timothy I. Hooker v. Nancy HookerDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2015-08-26· cited 2×
- Denise Sorgen v. Michael SorgenDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2014-07-02· cited 1×
- Moss v. MossDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2002-10-25
- Nelson v. NelsonDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1999-06-17
- Hay v. HayDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2006-05-10
Cites
9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Robertson v. RobertsonSupreme Court of Florida· 1991-12-05· cited 80×
- Hamlet v. HamletSupreme Court of Florida· 1991-06-13· cited 49×
- Ed Ricke & Sons v. Green by and Through SwanSupreme Court of Florida· 1985-03-28· cited 46×
- Romano v. RomanoDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1994-02-16· cited 26×
- Geddes v. GeddesDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1988-08-31· cited 26×
- Bobb v. BobbDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1989-11-22· cited 18×
- McMonagle v. McMonagleDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1993-04-16· cited 16×
- Amato v. AmatoDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1992-04-15· cited 16×
- Ibanez-Vogelsang v. VogelsangDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1992-07-07· cited 4×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.