Williams v. Wendler

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a suspension from a public university is not a deprivation of constitutional property
• rejecting \the bald assertion that any student who is suspended from college has suffered a deprivation of constitutional property\
• explaining that recognizing the plaintiff’s claim of a standalone “entitlement to fair procedure . . . would dissolve the requirement of showing a deprivation of life, liberty, or property as a precondition to complaining about a denial of due process”
• rejecting “the bald assertion that any student who is suspended from col- lege has suffered a deprivation of constitutional property”
• stating because every “student who was not admitted would have a right to a hearing on why he was not admitted; but also because the Supreme Court requires more”
• showing of mere “entitlement to fair procedure” insufficient “as that would dissolve the requirement of showing a deprivation of life, liberty, or property as a precondition to complaining about a denial of due process”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).