Williams v. Wedding

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that Department of Labor response to comments was “neither ‘plainly erroneous’ nor ‘inconsistent with the regulation,’ and thus entitled to deference under Auer”
• “[I]n certain contexts, ap- plication of a multifactor test can cause a court to miss the forest for the trees.”
• workers who performed community service intended to secure adjournment of criminal charges, not secure compensation

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).