Skip to main content
· 3/17/1999

Williams v. Wci Steel Company, Inc.

Citations

  • 170 F.3d 598
  • 160 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2713
  • 1999 U.S. App. LEXIS 4201

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • affirming the district court’s grant of summary judgment for the defendant where the putative plan and surrounding circumstances failed to meet at least two of the Donovan Prerequisites and the plaintiff, therefore, could not sustain a viable ERISA claim
  • “[B]ecause the Memorandum Agreement fails at least two of the [Plan] [F]actors, we will affirm the conclusion of the district court that plaintiffs did not state a viable claim under ERISA.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.