Skip to main content
· 6/30/1898

Williams v. Viselich

Citations

  • 121 Cal. 314
  • 53 P. 807
  • 1898 Cal. LEXIS 901

Syllabus

<p>Stbeet Assessment—Appeal to City Council ebom Assessment—Notice or Appeal.—Under section 11 of the street improvement act (Stats. 1885, p. 156), a notice of an appeal hy the contractor to the city council from a street assessment, which is signed by the city clerk and published for the requisite period of five days, is sufficient if in the following form, to wit: “Notice.is hereby given that an appeal of John E. Magary, contractor for paving with basalt and curbing with granite curbing Washington street, from Hunter street to El Dorado street, in the city of Stockton, to the city council of said city from the assessment for such paving and curbing made by the street commissioner of said city, and from the diagram and warrant thereto attached, on the ground that some of the lots so assessed were assessed to the wrong persons, and for informalities of said assessment, diagram, and warrant, will be heard by said city council at its regular meeting to be held at the courtroom of Department No. One of the superior court of San Joaquin county, California, on the twenty-eighth day of May, 1888, commencing at eight o’clock P. M. of that date, or as soon thereafter as same can be heard.”</p> <p>Id.—Pasties Affected by Apfbab.—Such notice is not required to be directed, eo nomine, to the persons who might be affected by the appeal.</p>

Judges: Harrison

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.