Skip to main content
· 5/26/2009

Williams v. U.S. Secretary of Education

Citations

  • 335 F. App'x 670

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “The Court has an ‘independent duty to review any fee application, even in the absence of an objection from an interested party.’” (citation omitted)
  • See e.g., In re Basham, 208 B.R. 926 (9th Cir. BAP 1997); In re Kowalski, 402 B.R. 843, 848 (Bankr. N.D. Ill. 2009) (citing In re Whaley, 282 B.R. 38, 41 (Bankr. M.D. Fla. 2002)); In re Bennett, 133 B.R. 374, 378 (Bankr. N.D. Tex. 1991)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Berzon, Canby, Pregerson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.