Williams v. U.S. Marshals Serv.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “the BIA may apply the doctrine of waiver to refuse to consider an argument that was not raised before an IJ”
• holding that when the BIA determines that an issue has been waived, “this Court’s review is limited to whether the BIA erred in deeming the argument waived”
• holding that “[w]here the agency properly applies its own waiver 2 rule,” our “review is limited to whether the BIA erred in deeming the argument 3 waived”
• concluding that 5 BIA properly declined to “consider an issue that could have 6 been, but was not, raised before [the] IJ” and declining to 7 address claim in first instance
• holding that 8 BIA may decline to consider issue not raised before IJ
• explaining that where the BIA finds an issue 3 waived, “this Court’s review is limited to whether the BIA erred in deeming the 4 argument waived”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).