Skip to main content
· 9/28/2010

Williams v. United Parcel Service

Citations

  • 328 S.W.3d 497
  • 2010 Tenn. LEXIS 886
  • 2010 WL 3749414

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “[T]he General Assembly’s purpose [in creating the MIR process] was to provide an efficient method for presenting neutral, objective opinions regarding an employee’s impairment to aid trial courts when the parties disagree regarding the extent of the impairment.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Koch, Blackwood, Kurtz

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.