· 7/7/2009
Williams v. Underhill
Citations
- 337 F. App'x 688
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- finding that the plaintiff’s amended complaint, which added a new claim, related back to the original complaint where it involved the same disputed contract and merely fleshed out the facts about events preceding and following the signing of the contract
- “As false pretenses is a species of fraud, the heightened pleading requirement applicable to fraud claims applies equally.” (citation omitted)
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Berzon, Roth, Schroeder
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.