· 9/15/1987
Williams v. UN. COMP. BD. OF REV.
Citations
- 531 A.2d 88
- 109 Pa. Commw. 329
- 1987 Pa. Commw. LEXIS 2463
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- claimant engaged in willful misconduct and was not eligible for benefits where in the course of his representation of union meetings with management, claimant violated a work rule prohibiting the use of profane and vulgar language
- claimant engaged in willful misconduct and was not eligible for benefits where in the course of his representation of union meetings with management, claimant violated a work rule prohibiting the use of profane and vulgar language
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: MacPhail, Barry, Barbieri
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.