Skip to main content
· 9/15/1987

Williams v. UN. COMP. BD. OF REV.

Citations

  • 531 A.2d 88
  • 109 Pa. Commw. 329
  • 1987 Pa. Commw. LEXIS 2463

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • claimant engaged in willful misconduct and was not eligible for benefits where in the course of his representation of union meetings with management, claimant violated a work rule prohibiting the use of profane and vulgar language
  • claimant engaged in willful misconduct and was not eligible for benefits where in the course of his representation of union meetings with management, claimant violated a work rule prohibiting the use of profane and vulgar language

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: MacPhail, Barry, Barbieri

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.