Williams v. Tracey & Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that “[t]he Gold Cup machine is similar to a slot machine” and even if it was not a gambling device per se, it was undisputed that it was being “used for gambling purposes in violation of Section 5513(a)”
• finding that “[t]he Gold Cup machine is similar to a slot machine” and even if it was not a gambling device per se, it was undisputed that it was being “used for gambling purposes in violation of Section 5513(a)”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).