Skip to main content
· 1/20/1898

Williams v. Tomlin

Citations

  • 2 Va. Dec. 565
  • 28 S.E. 883

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding that the plaintiff had a “reasonable apprehension of suit” where threats were made in the context of negotiations
  • describing the effect on the defendant of the plaintiff’s tactical filing of a declaratory judgment action
  • emphasizing the court’s obligation to look beyond the form or particular “magic words” used by the parties to the substance of their communications
  • discussing two-part test for determining whether an actual controversy exists in suits requesting a declaration of patent invalidity
  • determining case or controversy existed but district court refused to grant jurisdiction because parties still negotiating and grant would create incentive structure for plaintiffs to seek unfair bargaining position
  • affirming decision to decline to exercise jurisdiction even where actual controversy existed

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Riely

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.