Skip to main content
· 3/8/2012

Williams v. Tilaye

Citations

  • 272 P.3d 235
  • 174 Wash. 2d 57

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • \[s]tatutory interpretation is a question of law reviewed de novo\ (citing State v. Wentz , 149 Wash.2d 342 , 346, 68 P.3d 282 (2003) )
  • “[statutory interpretation is a question of law reviewed de novo” (citing State v. Wentz, 149 Wn.2d 342, 346, 68 P.3d 282 (2003))
  • \[s]tatutory interpretation is a question of law reviewed de novo\ (citing State v. Wentz, 149 Wn.2d 342, 346, 68 P.3d 282 (2003))
  • \Statutory interpretation is a question of law reviewed de novo\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Chambers, Madsen, Johnson, Owens, Fairhurst, Stephens, Wiggins, Alexander

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.