Skip to main content

Williams v. the State

Citations

  • 336 Ga. App. 442
  • 784 S.E.2d 808
  • 2016 Ga. App. LEXIS 201

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • a police officer’s conclusory trial testimony that “running” the defendant’s license revealed that the defendant’s driving “privilege in Georgia was not valid,” was insufficient to support a conviction under OCGA § 40-5-20
  • “Under the new Evidence Code, hearsay if unobjected to is admissible.” (citing Rule 802)
  • a police officer’s conclusory trial testimony that “running” the defendant’s license revealed that the defendant’s driving “privilege in Georgia was not valid,” was insufficient to support a conviction under OCGA § 40-5-20

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Boggs, Doyle, Phipps

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.