Skip to main content
· 9/28/2005

Williams v. Texas Department of Criminal Justice-Institutional Division

Citations

  • 176 S.W.3d 590
  • 2005 WL 1693472

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that dismissal was proper where inmate listed previous suits but failed to include operative facts because \the trial court was unable to consider whether Williams's current claim was substantially similar to his previous claims\
  • holding that dismissal was proper where inmate listed previous suits but failed to include operative facts because “the trial court was unable to consider whether Williams’s current claim was substantially similar to his previous claims”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Worthen, Griffith, Devasto

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.