Williams v. Terese

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding Pennsylvania’s infancy tolling statute inapplicable because “appellant brought suit beyond even the extended statute of limitations period after reaching the age of majority[ ] and ... § 5533(b)(2
• finding no tolling where defendants never concealed the fact of the injury itself, the identity of the abuser, or the abuser’s place within the Archdiocese
• finding no tolling where defendants never concealed the fact of the injury itself, the identity of the abuser, or the abusers place within the Archdiocese
• “As in Meehan, appellant, here, is really claiming that he was unaware, not of his injury, but of a secondary cause of his injury[.]”
• intentional infliction of emotional distress from youth sexual contact, holding 10-year-old claims were time barred
• both holding that the statute of limitations time-barred cases, because the victims should have known that the Church was potentially liable for any harm they suffered the moment a clergy member sexually assaulted them

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).