Skip to main content
· 5/22/1968

Williams v. Stockman's Life Insurance Company

Citations

  • 441 P.2d 608
  • 250 Or. 160
  • 1968 Ore. LEXIS 531

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • insured was entitled to attorney fees under predecessor to ORS 742.061 after prevailing in action with “declaratory judgment overtones,” because the “essential nature” of the action was to recover under the insurance policy
  • insured was entitled to attorney fees under predecessor to ORS 742.061 after prevailing in action with “declaratory judgment over- tones,” because the “essential nature” of the action was to recover under the insurance policy

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Perry, Sloan, Goodwin, Holman, Lusk

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.