Williams v. State Farm Insurance Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding Utah's version of rule 9(b) applicable to pleading a defense of misrepresentation on an insurance application
• holding Utah's version of rule 9(b) applicable to pleading a defense of misrepresentation on an insurance application
• stating that the relevant surrounding facts for a fraud claim \must be set forth with sufficient particularity to show what facts are claimed to constitute such charges\ (internal quotation marks omitted)
• stating that fraud, conspiracy, and negligence are subject to the particularity requirement
• \[T]he fundamental purpose of our liberalized pleading rules is to afford parties `the privilege of presenting whatever legitimate contentions they have pertaining to their dispute.'\ (quoting Cheney v. Rucker, 14 Utah 2d 205, 211, 381 P.2d 86, 91 (1963))
• “[T]he fundamental purpose of our liberalized pleading rules is to afford parties ‘the privilege of presenting whatever legitimate contentions they have pertaining to their dispute.’ ” (quoting Cheney v. Rucker, 14 Utah 2d 205, 211, 381 P.2d 86, 91 (1963))

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).