District Court of Appeal of Florida· 6/7/1989
Williams v. State
Citations
- 547 So. 2d 179
- 14 Fla. L. Weekly 1383
- 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 3209
- 1989 WL 58718
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- where State challenges black veniremen for being inattentive, that rationale will be deemed pretextual unless the State's rationale is either an uncontested matter of fact made part of the record or is supported by observations made by the trial judge in the record
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Hersey, Letts, Stone
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
5 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Hatten v. StateMississippi Supreme Court· 1993-11-24· cited 122×
- People v. AllenCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2004-01-30· cited 18×
- McKinnon v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1989-08-16· cited 6×
- Timmons v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1989-07-14· cited 5×
- People v. AllenCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2002-10-23
Cites
6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Batson v. KentuckySupreme Court· 1986-04-30· cited 16,401×
- State v. NeilSupreme Court of Florida· 1984-09-27· cited 507×
- State v. SlappySupreme Court of Florida· 1988-03-10· cited 333×
- United States v. Spiver Whitney GordonEleventh Circuit· 1987-06-02· cited 107×
- Tillman v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1988-03-10· cited 31×
- Hill v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1989-06-07· cited 14×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.