Williams v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “This Court has recognized that proof of circumstances from which the jury may reasonably infer the fact is sufficient in proving the element of reliance.” (internal quotation marks omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

1 case in this archive cites this case.

• Dino Rikos v. The Procter & Gamble Co.
  Sixth Circuit· 2015-08-20· cited 129×

Cites

2 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Thaxton v. State
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 1990-05-02· cited 96×
• Clark v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1978-02-16· cited 7×