Supreme Court of Kansas· 12/17/2021
Williams v. State
Citations
- 500 P.3d 1182
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- finding Miller inapplicable to upward durational departure enhancing sentence from hard 25 to hard 50
- “In Jones, the Court held that Miller does not require a sentencing court to explain on the record how it considered youth[.]”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Cited by
2 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
14 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Miller v. AlabamaSupreme Court· 2012-06-25· cited 6,816×
- Roper v. SimmonsSupreme Court· 2005-03-01· cited 3,523×
- Graham v. FloridaSupreme Court· 2010-05-17· cited 3,477×
- Atkins v. VirginiaSupreme Court· 2002-06-20· cited 3,384×
- Montgomery v. LouisianaSupreme Court· 2016-01-25· cited 2,780×
- Kennedy v. LouisianaSupreme Court· 2008-06-25· cited 620×
- Jones v. MississippiSupreme Court· 2021-04-22· cited 377×
- Davis v. McCollumTenth Circuit· 2015-08-25· cited 54×
- Bell v. UribeNinth Circuit· 2013-09-05· cited 34×
- Evans-Garcia v. United StatesFirst Circuit· 2014-02-28· cited 30×
- State v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Kansas· 2004-03-19· cited 19×
- Curtis Croft v. Tarry WilliamsSeventh Circuit· 2014-11-25· cited 12×
- Williams v. StateCourt of Appeals of Kansas· 2020-10-09· cited 5×
- Williams v. StateCourt of Appeals of Kansas· 2009-04-24· cited 2×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.