Williams v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that a shooting victim’s statement that the defendant shot him “made spontaneously and contemporaneously with the event” qualified as an excited utterance

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Gotwald v. Gotwald
  Court of Appeals of Tennessee· 1988-11-09· cited 55×
• State v. Northcutt
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee· 1978-02-28· cited 17×
• People v. Johnson
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1995-04-27· cited 10×
• Shelton v. United States
  District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2009-11-12· cited 7×
• Shelton v. United States
  District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2011-07-14· cited 4×
• State of Tennessee v. Stanley Phillip Chapman
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee· 2005-11-02
• State of Tennessee v. Johnny Lorenzo Wade
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee· 2018-07-13

Cites

11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• McBee v. State
  Tennessee Supreme Court· 1963-09-11· cited 349×
• Farris v. State
  Tennessee Supreme Court· 1976-03-30· cited 112×
• United States v. Remington
  Second Circuit· 1951-08-22· cited 106×
• Monts v. State
  Tennessee Supreme Court· 1966-03-02· cited 73×
• Turner v. State
  Tennessee Supreme Court· 1949-03-11· cited 73×
• Clarke v. State
  Tennessee Supreme Court· 1966-02-02· cited 64×
• Graves v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee· 1972-07-31· cited 19×
• Arterburn v. State
  Tennessee Supreme Court· 1961-03-10· cited 10×
• Smith v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee· 1969-12-16· cited 9×
• State v. Jones
  Tennessee Supreme Court· 1964-12-11· cited 8×
• Morelock v. State
  Tennessee Supreme Court· 1891-09-26· cited 6×