Williams v. State

Citations

• 65 Fla. 367
• 61 So. 829

Syllabus

<p>1. Where a question was propounded to the prosecuting witness on cross-examination, which was intended to prove good feeling between the defendant and the prosecuting witness at sometime previous to the alleged assault on the prosecuting witness and before the cause of the quarrel between them had arisen, it is not apparent that the trial judge erred in refusing to allow the question to be asked.</p> <p>2. A trial judge in supervising the conduct of a trial and the examination of witnesses, commits no reversible error in refusing to allow defendant’s attorney to order a witness to move his seat to a place designated by the defendant’s attorney when no sufficient reason appears for a change of position by the witness.</p> <p>3. The evidence examined and found sufficient to sustain the verdict.</p>