Williams v. State
Citations
- 41 Tex. 209
Syllabus
<p>1. Trial by jury.—When the evidence on the trial of a criminal cause tends to establish different and opposite conclusions, it is for the jury to And their verdict upon the evidence which, in their judgment, is entitled to most credit; and if the judge who tried the cause has refused to set aside a verdict of guilty found on such evidence, the conviction will not be disturbed in this court.'</p> <p>2. CibcumstantiaXi EVIDENCE.—To authorize a conviction on circumstantial evidence, the circumstances should not only be consistent with the prisoner’s guilt, but inconsistent with any other rational ‘ conclusion or reasonable hypothesis consistent with the facts proven.</p>
Judges: Reeves
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
7 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State v. WillinghamSupreme Court of Louisiana· 1881-04-15· cited 8×
- Haynie v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas· 1877-07-01
- Rodriguez v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas· 1878-07-01
- Irvin v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas· 1879-07-01
- Slaughter v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas· 1879-07-01
- Myers v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas· 1880-07-01
- Pharr v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas· 1881-07-01
Cites
3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.