Williams v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “Under the plain language of rule 3.210(b), the terms ‘shall’ and ‘immediately’ reflect that a hearing is mandatory.”
• “Because the trial court erroneously allowed Williams to stipulate to his competency, we must reverse.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

8 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Scott Michael Sheheane v. State of Florida
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2017-10-16· cited 27×
• Baker v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2017-05-31· cited 24×
• Deferrell v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2016-08-17· cited 21×
• NICHOLAS PAUL RAITHEL v. STATE OF FLORIDA
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2017-08-30· cited 9×
• Louis Burney, Jr. v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2018-05-14· cited 4×
• AUGUSTUS ROSE v. STATE OF FLORIDA
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2018-06-06· cited 1×
• RAYMOND HANNA v. STATE OF FLORIDA
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2017-10-04
• GERALD LEE ROGERS v. STATE OF FLORIDA
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2019-10-30

Cites

2 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Bernard J. Dougherty v. State of Florida
  Supreme Court of Florida· 2014-10-16· cited 152×
• McCray v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 2011-07-07· cited 73×