Skip to main content

Williams v. State

Citations

  • 50 P.3d 1116
  • 118 Nev. 536
  • 118 Nev. Adv. Rep. 56
  • 2002 Nev. LEXIS 67

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that evidence of county's negligence was irrelevant in a trial for DUI causing death because any negligence was a preexisting condition that could not establish that defendant was not the proximate cause of the SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA 2 (0
  • explaining that NRS 484.3795(l)(f), which applies to a person who has a proNbited level of a controlled substance in his or her blood, does not require impairment and that NRS 484.3795(l)(d
  • explaining that NRS 484.3795( l )(f), which applies to a person who has a prohibited level of a controlled substance in his or her blood, does not require impairment and that NRS 484.3795( l )(d
  • identifying “traffic safety” as a rational basis for the Nevada per se marijuana statute
  • approving the same proximate cause instruction because \an intervening cause must be a superseding cause or the sole cause in order to completely excuse the prior act\ (internal quotation marks omitted)
  • evaluating the statute which at the time was codified as NRS 484.379

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Leavitt, Maupin, Young, Shearing, Agosti, Rose, Becker

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

23 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.