Williams v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “Intent, which is a mental attitude, is commonly detectible only inferentially, and the law accommodates this[,]”so that such a finding will be upheld even where the supporting evidence “is exceedingly weak and unsatisfactory[.]”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

2 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Washington v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2011-08-15· cited 1×
• In Re Jason Adams
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2020-03-13

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Mays v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2010-10-19· cited 18×
• Thornton v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2009-12-22· cited 16×
• Smith v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1984-10-11· cited 15×
• Marshall v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2007-06-22· cited 5×
• Howell v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1988-09-06· cited 4×
• King v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1994-08-12· cited 4×
• House v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2010-09-17· cited 2×