Skip to main content

Williams v. State

Citations

  • 417 N.E.2d 328
  • 275 Ind. 434

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • trial court did not err in denying discovery request for police files that detailed results of ongoing criminal investigation because State had \self-evident\ interest in keeping that information confidential
  • trial court did not err in denying discovery request for police files that detailed results of ongoing criminal investigation because State had “self-evident” interest in keeping that information confidential

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Prentice, Givan, Debruler, Hunter, Pivarnik

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

25 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.