Skip to main content

Williams v. State

Citations

  • 574 So. 2d 136
  • 1991 WL 16327

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • challenge of juror because she was not really responsive to the questions and was not paying close attention deemed insufficient
  • where trial court required state to explain the exclusion, \there can be no doubt that the defense created sufficient doubt in the trial court's mind\
  • juror improperly excused for the reason that he failed to understand the felony murder doctrine, because record revealed no questions were asked of that juror in regard to that doctrine
  • new trial ordered where record fails to support reason given for challenge

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Per Curiam

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

21 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.