Skip to main content

Williams v. State

Citations

  • 974 So. 2d 405
  • 2007 WL 486397

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that postconviction court did not attribute defendant’s lack of credibility to his demeanor or any inconsistent actions and thus court did not articulate any reason for finding appellant’s testimony not credible

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Stringer

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

2 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.