District Court of Appeal of Florida· 9/25/1998
Williams v. State
Citations
- 717 So. 2d 1109
- 1998 WL 654053
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- concluding that officer had probable cause to conduct search where in a location known for frequent drug sales, the defendant looked to see if anyone was watching before extracting a small item from the buttocks area of his pants and exchanging it for an unknown item
- concluding that officer had probable cause to conduct search where in a location known for frequent drug sales, the defendant looked to see if anyone was watching before extracting a small item from the buttocks area of his pants and exchanging it for an unknown item
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Harris
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
6 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State v. HankersonSupreme Court of Florida· 2011-06-30· cited 34×
- League v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2001-03-07· cited 12×
- Edward Morgan, Jr. v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2015-08-06· cited 6×
- Glover v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2003-03-07· cited 4×
- Bell v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2006-11-17· cited 1×
- State v. M.R.District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2012-11-14
Cites
2 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.