Skip to main content

Williams v. State

Citations

  • 673 So. 2d 974
  • 1996 WL 278830

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding prosecutor's closing remarks were erroneous where they clearly were calculated to impress upon the jury that it must believe the police officers because they were police officers
  • reversing conviction where prosecutor suggested officers would not lie where whole case was based on whether defendant or police officers were more credible
  • reversing conviction where prosecutor suggested officers would not lie where whole case was based on whether defendant or police officers were more credible

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Per Curiam

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

10 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.