Skip to main content

Williams v. State

Citations

  • 784 S.W.2d 428
  • 1990 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 22
  • 1990 WL 11775

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that furtive gestures, like fidgeting in the back of a patrol car, could rationally have linked the defendant with narcotics later found in the seat of the patrol car
  • holding that furtive gestures, like fidgeting in the back of a patrol car, could rationally have linked the defendant with narcotics later found in the seat of the patrol car
  • holding that evidence was sufficient to support conviction where the officer had searched his car before arresting the defendant and the defendant was seen “fidgeting, reaching and rubbing” while in the car
  • an appellate court may not secondguess the finding at trial so long as some rational factfinder could conclude that any remaining doubts or outstanding hypotheses are not reasonable
  • where similar evidence was held to be legally sufficient to support conviction
  • where similar evidence was held to be legally sufficient to support conviction

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Per Curiam

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

30 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

2 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.