Skip to main content

Williams v. State

Citations

  • 853 P.2d 537
  • 1993 Alas. App. LEXIS 24
  • 1993 WL 187023

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • \[A] court is obliged to avoid construing statutes in a way that leads to patently absurd results or to defeat of the obvious legislative purpose behind the statute.\
  • “[A] court is obliged to avoid construing statutes in a way that leads to patently absurd results or to defeat of the obvious legislative purpose behind the statute.”
  • police had probable cause to make a traffic stop because the evidence, viewed in the light most favorable to the district court’s ruling, established that the driver’s taillight was emitting at least some white light in violation of 13 AAC 04.145(e)
  • similar statute requires that taillights emit only red light

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Bryner, Coats, Mannheimer

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

9 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.