Williams v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• reflecting that no per se rule required suppression of confession — which was suppressed on other grounds — because of delay of first appearance until thirty hours after arrest

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Chavez v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 2002-11-21· cited 79×
• Globe v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 2004-03-18· cited 69×
• Keen v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1987-03-19· cited 51×
• Anderson v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1986-04-18· cited 1×
• Davis v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1985-05-01

Cites

16 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Blockburger v. United States
  Supreme Court· 1931-12-11· cited 10,676×
• Edwards v. Arizona
  Supreme Court· 1981-06-22· cited 6,931×
• Iannelli v. United States
  Supreme Court· 1975-03-25· cited 1,423×
• Faison v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1983-02-10· cited 228×
• State v. Hegstrom
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1981-07-30· cited 126×
• Bell v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1983-06-09· cited 106×
• State v. Baker
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1984-07-12· cited 91×
• Copeland v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1984-09-13· cited 48×
• State v. Carpenter
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1982-07-29· cited 46×
• Hawkins v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1983-07-14· cited 31×
• State v. Harris
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1983-09-16· cited 15×
• Portee v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1984-03-15· cited 13×
• Nettles v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1982-01-18· cited 9×
• Headrick v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1978-12-28· cited 7×
• Silling v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1982-06-11· cited 4×
• Bowker v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1985-04-11· cited 1×