Williams v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• cash seized during defendant's arrest was relevant to prove defendant possessed cocaine with intent to sell
• court ruled it was proper to allow officer with specialized knowledge to express his opinion on the relationship between large amounts of cash and drug transactions

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

8 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Lowder v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1991-10-08· cited 51×
• Gamble v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1994-10-14· cited 15×
• Mutcherson v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1997-06-27· cited 11×
• Barrett v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1992-09-23· cited 5×
• Ezell v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1995-02-01· cited 4×
• Walker v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2011-12-07· cited 1×
• Thomas v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1990-08-14· cited 1×
• Tony v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1994-10-26

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• United States v. Alan Ginsberg and Carlos Ivan Piedrahita
  Second Circuit· 1985-03-26· cited 95×
• United States v. Luis Cruz and Rogelio Chacon
  Second Circuit· 1986-07-31· cited 74×
• United States v. Myron Dinovo and Janet Dinovo
  Seventh Circuit· 1975-08-13· cited 61×
• United States v. Cecil Daniels
  Eighth Circuit· 1983-12-12· cited 29×
• United States v. Lionel Spell and Stanley Watson
  Second Circuit· 1986-04-25· cited 9×
• In the Interest of B.P.
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1989-02-01· cited 5×
• Hosbein v. Silverstein
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1978-04-10· cited 4×