Williams v. St. Paul Ramsey Medical Center, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that the exclusivity provision in the MHRA preempted a separate claim under Minnesota’s whistleblower act based on the same alleged discriminatory practice and facts
• concluding that the “exclusivity provision of the [MHRA] operates as a bar to the separate maintenance of this claim under the Whis-tleblower Act”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).