Skip to main content

Williams v. Smith

Citations

  • 820 N.W.2d 807
  • 2012 Minn. LEXIS 393
  • 2012 WL 3192812

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that a tort claim that “[did] not involve any inquiry into” a government entity’s employment decision was not subject to certiorari review
  • recognizing duties of accountants to clients, attorneys to clients, guardians to wards, and directors to corporations
  • to prove negligent misrepresentation claim, plaintiff must prove justifiable reliance on the misrepresentation
  • listing the elements of negligent misrepresentation
  • articulating elements of a negligent-misrepresentation claim
  • stating elements of negligent-misrepresentation claim

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Anderson, Consideration, Dietzen, Esther, Gildea, Meyer, Senyk, Stras, Tomljanovich, Took, Waldemar

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

12 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

38 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.