Williams v. Shup

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that no-action clause may prohibit individual holders, but not the indenture trustee, from bringing fraudulent conveyance claim
• bonds must be enforced “according to the plain meaning of [their] terms” (citation omitted)
• bonds must be enforced “according to the plain meaning of [their] terms” (citation omitted)
• bonds must be enforced “according to the plain meaning of [their] terms” (citation omitted)
• bonds must be enforced “according to the plain meaning of [their] terms” (citation omitted)
• “When reviewing a contract, particular words should be considered, not as if isolated from the context, but in the light of the obligation as a whole and the intention of the parties manifested thereby.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).