Williams v. Shultz

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the trial court erred by requiring plaintiff to prove hills and ridges in situation - 18 - J-A04019-20 involving “a specific, localized, isolated patch of ice” hidden by leaves on a sidewalk without recent precipitation
• finding that hills and ridges doctrine did not apply where plaintiff fell on isolated patch of ice covered by leaves on sidewalk and sidewalk was otherwise clear
• indicating that the doctrine of hills and ridges applies to preclude liability where \the accident occurred at a time when general slippery conditions prevailed in the community as a result of recent precipitation\
• indicating that the doctrine of hills and ridges applies to preclude liability where “the accident occurred at a time when general slippery conditions prevailed in the community as a result of recent precipitation”
• indicating that the doctrine of hills and ridges applied to preclude liability where “the accident occurred at a time when general slippery conditions prevailed in the community as a result of recent precipitation”
• indicating that the doctrine of hills and ridges applies to preclude liability where “the accident occurred at a time when general slippery conditions prevailed in the community as a result of recent precipitation” (citations omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).