Skip to main content
· 4/11/2018

Williams v. SAIF Corp. (In re Williams)

Citations

  • 420 P.3d 26
  • 291 Or. App. 328

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the court’s “protest jurisdiction extends to protests of task or delivery orders placed against a GSA schedule contract”
  • noting evaluation of proposals based on the type of work performed, and separately on quality of performance that “[t]hese are not identical considerations”
  • explaining that the GAO decision “is given no deference”
  • explaining that the GAO decision “is given no deference”
  • “The court’s protest jurisdiction extends to protests of task or delivery orders placed against a GSA schedule contract.”
  • “The court’s protest jurisdiction extends to protests of task or delivery orders placed against a GSA schedule contract.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Egan, Lagesen, Ortega

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.