Supreme Court of Kansas· 5/5/1934
Williams v. Roberts
Citations
- 139 Kan. 460
- 32 P.2d 229
- 1934 Kan. LEXIS 88
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting that in plaintiff’s examination and cross-examination there was no evidence that [plaintiff] exhibited any kind of conduct indicating permanence of residence in Attica beyond simply living there
- noting that in plaintiff’s examination and cross-examination there was no evidence that [plaintiff] exhibited any kind of conduct indicating permanence of residence in Attica beyond simply living there
- noting that in plaintiff’s examination and cross-examination there was no evidence that [plaintiff] exhibited any kind of conduct indicating permanence of residence in Attica beyond simply living there
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Burch
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
1 case in this archive cites this case.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.